Excellent letter! Related to this, I recommend a book for more information on the accelerant of U.S. Imperialism, the Republican Party, under William McKinley and then more so, under NatCon, Straussian, Republican Josh Hawley’s favorite, Teddy Roosevelt, and seemingly Andrew Bacevich’s as he included Roosevelt’s proto-Fascist speech on The Strenuous Life in his panegyric to ultra-militaristic Conservatives in his book paying homage to them. I know no one reads my attachments, if they even read my emails, but, it is my small attempt to rebut and correct the right-wing revisionists busily rewriting right-wing history in building a “Usable Past” for the fascist/National Conservative/New Right of Trumpism, in a naked effort to sell Traditional Conservative Donald Trump as a “Restrainer.” So here’s more on Roosevelt, and U.S Imperialism in the attached files, by: WARREN ZIMMERMANN spent thirty-three years as an officer in the U.S. Foreign Service, serving in France, Austria, Spain, Switzerland, Venezuela, the Soviet Union, and as our last ambassador to Yugoslavia. |
Attachment:
Front Matter.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
Attachment:
Introduction.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
Attachment:
1. The Expansionist Impulse.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
Attachment:
6. Roosevelt.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
Attachment:
10. The White Man's Burden.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
Attachment:
11. The Imperial Presidency.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
From the Introduction: "This is a book about imperialism, a word not very popular among Americans as a description of their past. It was not very popular in 1898 either. Even Roosevelt and Lodge, two full-blooded imperialists, found euphemisms. For Roosevelt the preferred description was "Americanism"; for Lodge it was the "large policy." For both, "expansionism" was a barely acceptable definition of U.S. policy. "Of the five, only Mahan had no fear of defining and using the word "imperialism." He gave its traditional territorial meaning-the acquisition and holding of colonies and dependencies-a political dimension as well. Imperialism, he wrote, is "the extension of national authority over alien communities." This broader definition implies that a country does not have to own the territory of an alien community in order to exercise imperial authority over it. This book uses Mahan's interpretation, but with the proviso that imperialism as practiced by the United States contained unique features. . . . "Readers of this book will not be treated to a saga of triumphant America led by a small company of heroic figures. Nor will they be assaulted by a revisionist diatribe against the use of American power to keep weaker peoples down. The reality of America's rise to great power status was much more complex than a stereotyped account from the right or the left can convey. There was both darkness and light in the characters and actions of the principal American protagonists. Those peculiarly American combinations of ideology and pragmatism, of power and principle, and of racism and tolerance were as much a feature of the United States of I 898 as they are of the United Stat es today."
|